[1] Aarts, B. (1997). English syntax and argumentation. MacMillan Press, Basingstoke.

[2] Allen, J. (1997a). Argument Structures without Lexical Entries. PhD thesis, University of Southern California.

[3] Allen, J. (1997b). Probabilistic Constraints in Acquisition. In Sorace, A., Heycock, C. and Shillcock, R., (eds.), Proceedings of the GALA `97 Conference on Language Acquisition, pages 300-305. HCRC, Edinburgh.

[4] Baker, C.L. (1979). Syntactic Theory and the Projection Problem. Linguistic Inquiry, 10, p533-581.

[5] Bates, E.A. & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In Wanner, E. and Gleitman, L.R., (eds.), Language Acquisition: the State of the Art. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[6] Bates, E.A. & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation and language learning. In MacWhinney, B., (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, pages 157-194. Lawrence Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

[7] Bechtel, W. and Abrahamsen, A. (1991). Connectionism and the Mind: An Introduction to Parallel Processing in Networks. Blackwell, Oxford.

[8] Bengio, Y., Simard, P. and Frasconi, P. (1994). Learning long-term dependencies with gradient is difficult. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5 (2), p157-166.

[9] Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of Language. Karoma, Ann Arbor.

[10] Bickerton, D. (1984). The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behaviour and Brain Sciences, 7, p173-222.

[11] Bickerton, D. (1988). Creole languages and the bioprogram. In Newmeyer, F., (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, pages 267-284. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[12] Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[13] Bowerman, M. (1988). The `No Negative Evidence' Problem: How Do Children Avoid Constructing an Overly General Grammar? In Hawkins, J.A., (ed.), Explaining Language Universals, pages 73-101. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

[14] Brown, R. and Hanlon, C. (1970). Derivational Complexity and Order of Acquisition in Child Speech. In Hayes, J.R., (ed.), Cognition and the Development of Language, pages 11-54. Wiley, New York.

[15] Brugman, C. (1981). The Story of Over. MA thesis, University of California at Berkeley.

[16] Brugman, C. (1988). The Story of `Over': Polysemy, Semantics and the Structure of the Lexicon. Garland Press, New York.

[17] Brugman, C. and Lakoff, G. (1988). Cognitive topology and lexical networks. In Cottrell, G.W., Small, S. and Tannenhause, M.K., (eds.), Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Perspectives from Psycholinguistics, Neuropsychology and Artificial Intelligence, pages 477-508. Morgan Kaufman Publishers, San Mateo, CA.

[18] Cairns, P., Shillcock, R., Chater, N. and Levy, J. (1997). Bootstrapping Word Boundaries: A Bottom-up Corpus-Based Approach to Speech Segmentation. Cognitive Psychology, 33, p111-153.

[19] Cann, R. (1993). Formal Semantics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[20] Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[21] Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and Representations. Basil Blackwell, London.

[22] Chomsky, N. (1981). Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht.

[23] Chomsky, N. (1987). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. Foris, Dordrecht.

[24] Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[25] Curtiss, S.R. (1980). The critical period and feral children. UCLA Working Papers in Cognitive Linguistics, 2, p21-36.

[26] Elman, J.L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, p179-211.

[27] Elman, J.L. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small. Cognition, 48, p71-99.

[28] Feldman, L.D. and Ballard, D.H. (1982). Connectionist models and their properties. Cognitive Science, 6, p205-254.

[29] Fellbaum, C. (1998). WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[30] Fillmore, C.J. (1988). The mechanisms of `construction grammar'. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA.

[31] Fodor, J. (1992). A theory of the child's theory of mind. Cognition, 44, p283-296.

[32] Givon, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. Academic Press, New York.

[33] Givon, T. (1984). Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, Volume 1. Benjamins, Amsterdam.

[34] Goldowsky, B.N. and Newport, E.L. (1993). Modelling the Effects of Processing Limitations on the Acquisition of Morphology: the Less is More Hypothesis. In Clark, E., (ed), The proceedings of the 24th Annual Child Language Research Forum, pages 124-138. Centre for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA.

[35] Gopnik, M. (1994). Impairments of tense in a familial language disorder. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 8, p109-133.

[36] Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

[37] Harris, C.L. (1989). A connectionist approach to the story of over. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA.

[38] Harris, C.L. (1990). Connectionism and Cognitive Linguistics. Connection Science, 2, p7-33.

[39] Hinton, G.E. (1984). Parallel computations for controlling an arm. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 16, p171-194.

[40] Hinton, G.E. (1986). Learning distributed representations of concepts. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 1-12. Lawrence Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

[41] Hinton, G.E. (1987). Connectionist Learning Procedures. Technical Report CMU-CS-87-115, Computer Science Department, Carnegie-Mellon University.

[42] Hinton, G.E., McClelland, J.L. and Rumelhart, D.E. (1986). Distributed Representations. In Rumelhart et al., (1986), p77-109.

[43] Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic Structures, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[44] Jordan, M. (1986). Serial Order: a Parallel Distributed Processing Approach. ICS Report No. 8604, Institute for Cognitive Science, University of California at San Diego.

[45] Joyce, J. (1996). When/Why/Of What is Less More?. MSc dissertation, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh.

[46] Langacker, R.W. (1982). Space grammar, analysability, and the English passive. Language, 58, p22-80.

[47] Langacker, R.W. (1984). Active zones. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA.

[48] Langacker, R.W. (1986). An Introduction to Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Science, 10, p1-40.

[49] Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

[50] Levin, B. and Rappaport-Hovav, M. (1994). Unaccusativity: At the SyntaxLexical Semantics Interface, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[51] McClelland, J.L. and Kawamoto, A.H. (1986). Mechanisms of Sentence Processing: Assigning Roles to Constituents of Sentences. In McClelland et al., (1986), p272-325.

[52] McClelland, J.L. and Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, p375-407.

[53] McClelland, J.L., Rumelhart, D.E. and the PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing, Volume 2: Psychological and Biological Models. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[54] Mason, M. (1942). Learning to speak after six and one half years of silence. Journal of Speech Disorders, 7, p295-304.

[55] Mazurkewich, I. and White, L. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation: unlearning overgeneralisations. Cognition, 16, p261-283.

[56] Newport, E.L. (1990). Maturational Constraints on Language Learning. Cognitive Science, 14, p11-28.

[57] Peters, S. (1972). The Projection Problem: How is a Grammar to be Selected?. In Peters, S., (ed.), Goals of Linguistic Theory, pages 171-188. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

[58] Pinker, S. (1984). Language Learnability and Language Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

[59] Pinker, S. (1987). Resolving a learnability paradox in the acquisition of the verb lexicon. Lexicon Working Project Papers 17. Centre for Cognitive Science, MIT.

[60] Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and Cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[61] Rumelhart, D.E. and McClelland, J.L. (1986). On learning the past tense of English verbs. In McClelland et al., (1986), p216-271.

[62] Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E. and Williams, R.J. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In Rumelhart et al., (1986), p318-362.

[63] Rumelhart, D.E. McClelland, J.L. and et al. (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing, Volume 1: Foundations. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[64] Sejnowski, T.J. and Rosenberg, C.R. (1986). A Parallel Network that Learns to Read Outloud. Technical Report JHU/EECS-86/01, John Hopkins University.

[65] Servan-Schreiber, D., Cleeremans, A. and McClelland, J.L. (1988). Encoding sequential structure in simple recurrent networks. Technical Report CMU-CS-335-87, Computer Science Department, Carnegie-Mellon University.

[66] Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behaviour and Brain Sciences, 11, p1-74.

[67] Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns. In Shopen, T., (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.