1. Iwasa, Y., Pomiankowski, A., Nee, S.: The evolution of costly mate preferences II. The ``handicap'' principle. Evolution 45 (1991) 1431--1442

2. Fisher, R.A.: The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. OUP (1930)

3. Andersson, M.: Sexual Selection. Princeton Univ. Press (1994)

4. Zahavi, A.: Mate selection---a selection for a handicap. JTB 53 (1975) 205--214

5. Maynard Smith, J.: Sexual selection and the handicap principle. JTB 57 (1976) 239--242

6. Kirkpatrick, M.: The handicap mechanism of sexual selection does not function. Am. Naturalist 127 (1986) 222--240

7. Grafen, A.: Biological signals as handicaps. JTB 144 (1990) 517--546

8. Hamilton, W.D., Zuk, M.: Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites? Science 218 (1982) 384--387

9. Hurd, P.L.: Communication in discrete action-response games. JTB 174 (1995) 217--222

10. Bullock, S.: A continuous evolutionary simulation model of the attainability of honest signalling equilibria. In Adami, C., et al., eds.: Artificial Life VI, MIT Press (1998) 339--348

11. Wiley, R.H.: Territoriality and non-random mating in sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). Anim. Behav. Monographs 6 (1973) 85--169

12. Bradbury, J.W., Gibson, R.M., Tsai, I.M.: Hotspots and the evolution of leks. Anim. Behav. 34 (1986) 1694--1709

13. Maynard Smith, J.: The Evolution of Sex. CUP (1978)

14. Partridge, L.: Mate choice increases a component of offspring fitness in fruit flies. Nature 283 (1980) 290--291

15. Pomiankowski, A., Møller, A.P.: A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 260 (1995) 21--29

16. Werner, G.M.: Why the peacock's tail is so short: Limits to sexual selection. In Langton, C.G., Shimohara, K., eds.: Artificial Life V, MIT Press (1996) 85--91