HOME   ::   Back to the Paper   ::   References

Edelman, S., Solan, Z., Horn, D., and Ruppin, E. (2004) Bridging computational, formal and psycholinguistic approaches to language. In Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Chicago, IL.

References (may not be complete)  [Original format]  [Sort by year]  [Sort by author]  [Sort by citations]

[1] Z. Solan, E. Ruppin, D. Horn, and S. Edelman. Automatic acquisition and efficient representation of syntactic structures. In S. Thrun, ed., Advances in Neural Information Processing (NIPS), vol. 15, Cambridge, MA, 2003. MIT Press.

Google

[2] Z. Solan, E. Ruppin, D. Horn, and S. Edelman. Unsupervised efficient learning and representation of language structure. In R. Alterman and D. Kirsh, eds., Proc. 25th Conf. of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale, NJ, 2003. Erlbaum.

Google

[3] Z. Solan, D. Horn, E. Ruppin, and S. Edelman. Unsupervised context sensitive language acquisition from a large corpus. In L. Saul, ed., NIPS, vol. 16, Cambridge, MA, 2004. MIT Press.

Google UIUC

[4] R. Bod. Beyond grammar: an experience-based theory of language. CSLI Publications, Stanford, US, 1998.

Google

[5] A. Clark. Unsupervised Language Acquisition: Theory and Practice. PhD thesis, COGS, University of Sussex, 2001.

Google

[6] A. Roberts and E. Atwell. Unsupervised grammar inference systems for natural language. TR 2002.20, School of Computing, University of Leeds, 2002.

Google

[7] N. Chomsky. Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use. Praeger, New York, 1986.

Google

[8] J. L. Elman, E. A. Bates, M. H. Johnson, A. KarmiloffSmith, D. Parisi, and K. Plunkett. Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.

Google

[9] R. W. Langacker. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol.I: theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1987.

Google UIUC

[10] Z. S. Harris. Distributional structure. Word, 10:140-162, 1954.

Google

[11] M. van Zaanen. ABL: Alignment-Based Learning. In COLING 2000 Proceedings of the 18th International Conf. on Computational Linguistics, pp. 961-967, 2000.

Google

[12] F. Pereira. Formal grammar and information theory: Together again? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 358(1769):1239--1253, 2000.

Google

[13] P. J. Henrichsen. GraSp: Grammar learning form unlabeled speech corpora. In Proceedings of CoNLL-2002, pp. 22--28. Taipei, Taiwan, 2002.

Google

[14] M. Gross. The construction of local grammars. In E. Roche and Y. Schab-‘ es, eds., Finite-State Language Processing, pp. 329--354. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997.

Google

[15] I. Guyon and F. Pereira. Design of a linguistic postprocessor using Variable Memory Length Markov Models. In Proc. 3rd Int'l Conf. Document Analysis and Recogition, pp. 454--457, Montreal, Canada, 1995.

Google

[16] A. Joshi and Y. Schabes. Tree-Adjoining Grammars. In G. Rozenberg and A. Salomaa, eds., Handbook of Formal Languages, vol. 3, pp. 69--124. Springer, Berlin, 1997.

Google

[17] A. E. Goldberg. Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7:219--224, 2003.

Google UIUC

[18] J. R. Saffran, R. N. Aslin, and E. L. Newport. Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274:1926-1928, 1996.

Google

[19] R. L. G-’ omez and L. Gerken. Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6:178--186, 2002.

Google

[20] T. Cameron-Faulkner, E. Lieven, and M. Tomasello. A construction-based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science, 27:843--874, 2003.

Google

[21] A. Wray. Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002.

Google

[22] C. L. Harris. Psycholinguistic studies of entrenchment. In J. Koenig, ed., Conceptual Structures, Language and Discourse, vol. 2. CSLI, Berkeley, CA, 1998.

Google

[23] P. W. Culicover. Syntactic nuts: hard cases, syntactic theory, and language acquisition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.

Google

[24] W. Croft. Radical Construction Grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.

Google

[25] P. Kay and C. J. Fillmore. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the What's X Doing Y? construction. Language, 75:1--33, 1999.

Google

[26] D. Klein and C. D. Manning. Natural language grammar induction using a constituent-context model. In T. G. Dietterich, S. Becker, and Z. Ghahramani, eds., NIPS 14, Cambridge, MA, 2002. MIT Press.

Google

[27] A. Stolcke and S. Omohundro. Inducing probabilistic grammars by Bayesian model merging. In R. C. Carrasco and J. Oncina, eds., Grammatical Inference and Applications, pp. 106--118. Springer, 1994.

Google

[28] J. G. Wolff. Learning syntax and meanings through optimization and distributional analysis. In Y. Levy, I. M. Schlesinger, and M. D. S. Braine, eds., Categories and Processes in Language Acquisition, pp. 179--215. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1988.

Google

[29] C. G. Nevill-Manning and I. H. Witten. Identifying hierarchical structure in sequences: A linear-time algorithm. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 7:67-82, 1997.

Google

[30] I. A. Sag and T. Wasow. Syntactic theory: a formal introduction. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, 1999.

Google

[31] M. P. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M. A. Marcinkiewicz. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313--330, 1994.

Google

[32] A. Clark. Unsupervised induction of Stochastic Context-Free Grammars using distributional clustering. In Proceedings of CoNLL 2001, Toulouse, 2001.

Google

[33] C. Phillips. Syntax. In L. Nadel, ed., Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, vol. 4, pp. 319--329. Macmillan, London, 2003.

Google

 HOME   ::   Back to the Paper   ::   References Comments to: junwang4 you-know-at gmail.com Last update: 11/16/07