HOME   ::   Back to the Paper   ::   References

Eddy, J. C. (2005) Iterated Learning: The Exemplar-based Learning Approach. Master thesis, Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, The University of Edinburgh.

References (may not be complete)  [Original format]  [Sort by year]  [Sort by author]  [Sort by citations]

Aha, D. W., Kibler, D., and Albert, M. K. (1991). Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning, 6:37-66.

Google

Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21:435-483.

Google

Barsalou, L. W. (1989). On the indistinguishability of exemplar memory and abstraction in category representation. In T. K. Srull and R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in Social Cognition, (pp. 61-88). Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Google

Batali, J. (1994). Innate biases and critical periods: Combining evolution and learning in the acquisition of syntax. In R. Brooks and P. Maes (Eds.), Artificial Life 4: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, (pp. 160-171). Redwood City, CA, USA: Addison-Wesley.

Google UIUC

Batali, J. (1998). Computational simulations of the emergence of grammar. In J. R. Hurford, M Studdert-Kennedy and C. Knight (Eds.), Approached to the evolution of language: Social and cognitive bases (pp. 405-426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Google UIUC

Batali, J. (2002). The negotiation and acquisition of recursive grammars as a result of competition among exemplars. In E. Briscoe (Ed.), Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models (pp. 111-172). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Google UIUC

Belpaeme, T. (2001). Simulating the Formation of Color Categories. In B. Nebel (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2001(IJCAI'01) (pp. 393-398). Seattle, WA, USA: Morgan Kauffman.

Google UIUC

Bergen, B. K. (2001). Nativization processes in L1 Esperanto. Journal of Child Language, 28:575-595.

Google

Bickerton, D. (1990). Language and species. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.

Google UIUC

Bod, R. (1998). Beyond Grammar: An Experience-Based Theory of Language. Chicago, IL, USA: CSLI Publications, Center for the Study of Language and Information, University of Chicago Press.

Google

Brighton, H. (2002). Compositional syntax from cultural transmission. Artificial Life, 8:25-54.

Google UIUC

Brighton, H. and Kirby, S. (2001). The survival of the smallest: Stability conditions for the cultural evolution of compositional language. In J. Kelemen and P. Sosik (Eds.), Advances in Artificial Life (Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Artificial Life) (pp. 592-601). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Google UIUC

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

Google

Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and Representations. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.

Google

Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language. Praeger.

Google

Christiansen, M. H. and Ellefson, M. R. (2002). Linguistic Adaptation Without Linguistic Constraints: The Role of Sequential Learning in Language Evolution. In A. Wray (Ed.), Transitions to Language (pp. 335-358). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Google UIUC

De Boer, B. (1999). Self-Organisation in Vowel Systems. Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel AI-lab.

Google UIUC

Gold, E. M. (1967). Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10:447-474.

Google UIUC

Goroll, N. (1999). (The deep blue) Nile: Neuronal influences on language evolution. Master's thesis, University of Edinburgh.

Google

Hammond, K. (1990). Case-based planning: A framework for planning from experience. Cognitive Science, 14(3): 385-443.

Google

Hauser, M. D. (2001). What's so special about speech? In E. Dupoux (Ed.), Language, Brain, and Cognitive Development: Essays in Honor of Jacques Mehler (pp. 417-434). Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

Google

Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298:1569-1579.

Google UIUC

Hebb, D. (1949). The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.

Google

Hurford, J. R. (1987). Language and Number: The Emergence of a Cognitive System. New York, NY, USA: Basil Blackwell.

Google UIUC

Hurford, J. R. (1989). Biological evolution of the saussurean sign as a component of the language acquisition device. Lingua, 77:187-222.

Google UIUC

Hurford, J. R. (1990). Nativist and functional explanations in language acquisition. In I. M. Roca, (Ed.), Logical Issues in Language Acquisition (pp. 85-136). Foris, Dordrecht.

Google UIUC

Hurford, J. R. (2000). Social transmission favours linguistic generalization. In C. Knight, J. R. Hurford and M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.), The Evolutionary Emergence of Language: Social Function and the Origins of Linguistic Form (pp. 324-352). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Google UIUC

Hurford, J. R. (2002). Expression/induction models of language evolution: dimensions and issues. In E. Briscoe (Ed.), Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models (pp. 301-344). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Google UIUC

Jäger, G. (2003). Simulating language change with functional OT. In S. Kirby (Ed.), Proceedings of Language Evolution and Computation Workshop/Course at ESSLLI (pp. 52-61). Vienna.

Google

Kent, A., Berry, M., Leuhrs, F. U. and Perry, J. W. (1955). Machine literature searching viii: Operational criteria for designing information retrieval systems. American Documentation, 6(2):93-101.

Google

Kirby, S. (2000). Syntax without natural selection: How compositionality emerges from vocabulary in a population of learners. In C. Knight, M. Studdert-Kennedy and J. R. Hurford (Eds.), The evolutionary emergence of language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form (pp. 303-323). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Google UIUC

Kirby, S. (2001). Spontaneous evolution of linguistic structure: An iterated learning model of the emergence of regularity and irregularity. IEEE Journal of Evolutionary Computation, 5(2):102-110.

Google UIUC

Kirby, S. (2002a). Natural Language from Artificial Life. Artificial Life, 8(2):185-215.

Google UIUC

Kirby, S. (2002b). Learning, bottlenecks and the evolution of recursive syntax. In E. Briscoe (Ed.), Linguistic evolution through language acquisition: Formal and computational models (pp. 173-203). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Google UIUC

Kirby, S. and Hurford J. R. (1997). Learning, culture and evolution in the origin of linguistic constraints. In P. Husbands and I. Harvey (Eds.), Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life (pp. 493-502). Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

Google UIUC

Kirby, S. and Hurford J. R. (2002). The emergence of linguistic structure: An overview of the iterated learning model. In A. Cangelosi and D. Parisi (Eds.), Simulating the evolution of language (pp. 121-148). London, UK: Springer.

Google UIUC

Kirby, S., Smith, K. and Brighton, H. (2004). From UG to Universals: Linguistic adaptation through iterated learning. Studies in Language, 28(3):587-607.

Google UIUC

MacWhinney, B. and Bates, E. (1987). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney and E. Bates (Eds.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing (pp. 3-73). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

Google

Medin, D. L. and Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85:207-238.

Google

Montague R. (1970). English as a formal language. In B. Visentini, et al. (Eds.), Linguaggi nella Società e nella Tecnica (pp. 189-223). Milan: Edizioni di Comunità.

Google

Newmeyer, F. J. (1991). Functional explanation in linguistics and the origin of language. Language and Communication, 11:3-28.

Google UIUC

Nowak, M. A., Komarova, N. L. and Niyogi, P. (2001). Evolution of universal grammar. Science, 291:114-117.

Google UIUC

Oliphant, M. (1997). Formal Approaches to Innate and Learned Communication: Laying the Foundation for Language. PhD thesis, Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego.

Google UIUC

Oliphant, M. (1999). The learning barrier: Moving from innate to learned systems of communication. Adaptive Behavior, 7:371-384.

Google UIUC

Oliphant, M. and Batali, J. (1997). Learning and the emergence of coordinated communication. Center for Research on Language Newsletter, 11(1).

Google UIUC

Saussure, F. de. (1959). Course in general linguistics (translated by Wade Baskin). New York, NY, USA: McGraw Hill.

Google

Smith, A. D. M. (2003). Intelligent Meaning Creation in a Clumpy World Helps Communication. Artificial Life, 9(2): 175-190.

Google UIUC

Smith, K. (2002). The cultural evolution of communication in a population of neural networks. Connection Science, 14(1):65-84.

Google UIUC

Smith, K. (2003). The transmission of Language: models of biological and cultural evolution. PhD thesis, Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh.

Google UIUC

Teal, T. and Taylor, C. (1999). Compression and adaptation. In D. Floreano, J. D. Nicoud and F. Mondada (Eds.), Advances in artificial life (pp. 709-719). (No. 1674 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science). Berlin: Springer.

Google UIUC

Tonkes, B. (2002). On the origins of linguistic structure: Computational models of the evolution of language. PhD thesis, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Queensland, Australia.

Google UIUC

Vogt, P. (2003). Iterated Learning and Grounding: From Holistic to Compositional Languages. In S. Kirby (Ed.), Proceedings of Language Evolution and Computation Workshop/Course at ESSLLI (pp. 76-86). Vienna.

Google UIUC

von Frisch, K. (1974). Decoding the language of the bee. Science, 185:663-668.

Google

Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Google

Wray, A. (2005). `Needs only analysis' in linguistic ontogeny and phylogeny. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Emergence and Evolution of Linguistic Communication, 2005, 151-160.

Google

Zuidema, W. H. (2001). Emergent syntax: The unremitting value of computational modeling for understanding the origins of complex language. In J. Kelemen & P. Sosik (Eds.), Advances in Artificial Life (pp. 641-644). (No. 2159 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence). Berlin: Springer.

Google UIUC

Zuidema, W. H. (2003). How the poverty of the stimulus solves the poverty of the stimulus. In Suzanna Becker, Sebastian Thrun and Klaus Obermayer (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 12 (Proceedings of NIPS'02). Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

Google UIUC

 HOME   ::   Back to the Paper   ::   References Comments to: junwang4 you-know-at gmail.com Last update: 11/16/07