HOME   ::   Back to the Paper   ::   References

Brighton, H. (2005) Linguistic Evolution and Induction by Minimum Description Length. In Werning, M. and Machery, E., editors, The Compositionality of Concepts and Meanings: Applications to Linguistics, Psychology and Neuroscience. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.

References (may not be complete)  [Original format]  [Sort by year]  [Sort by author]  [Sort by citations]

Andersen, H. (1973). Abductive and deductive change. Language, 40:765--793.

Google

Baker, C. L. (1978). Introduction to Generative-Transformational Syntax. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Google

Batali, J. (2002). The negotiation and acquisition of recursive grammars as a result of competition among exemplars. In Briscoe, E., editor, Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models, pages 111--172. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Google UIUC

Bates, E. and Elman, J. (1996). Learning rediscovered. Science, 274:1849-1850.

Google

Brighton, H. (2002). Compositional syntax from cultural transmission. Artificial Life, 8(1):25--54.

Google UIUC

Brighton, H. (2003). Simplicity as a driving force in linguistic evolution. PhD thesis, The University of Edinburgh.

Google UIUC

Brighton, H., Kirby, S., and Smith, K. (2005). Cultural selection for learnability: Three principles underlying the view that language adapts to be learnable. In Compositionality and Linguistic Evolution 23 Tallerman, M., editor, Language Origins: Perspectives on Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Google UIUC

Chater, N. (1999). The search for simplicity: A fundamental cognitive principle? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A:273--302.

Google

Chater, N. and Vit’ anyi, P. M. B. (2003). Simplicity: a unifying principle in cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(1):19--22.

Google

Chater, N. and Vit’ anyi, P. M. B. (2004). A simplicity principle for language acquistion: Re-evaluating what can be learned from positive evidence. Manuscript under review.

Google

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Google

Chomsky, N. (2002). On Nature and Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Google

Christiansen, M. H. and Kirby, S. (2003). Language evolution: consensus and controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7):300--307.

Google UIUC

Clark, R. and Roberts, I. (1993). A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry, 24(2):299--345.

Google UIUC

Comrie, B. (1989). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Blackwell, Oxford, second edition.

Google

Cover, T. and Thomas, J. (1991). Elements of information theory. Wiley Interscience, New York.

Google

Cowie, F. (1999). What's within? Nativism Reconsidered. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Google

Crain, S. (1991). Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14:597--612.

Google

Croft, W. (1990). Typology and Universals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Google

Culicover, P. W. (1999). Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases, Syntactic Theory, and Language Acquistion. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Google

Deacon, T. W. (1997). The Symbolic Species. W. W. Norton and Company.

Google UIUC

Elman, J. L. (2003). Generalization from sparse input. In Proceedings of the 38 th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 24 Henry Brighton

Google

Glendinning, P. (1994). Stability, Instability, and Chaos: An Introduction to the Theory of Nonlinear Differential Equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Google

Grunwald, P. (2000). Model selection based on minimum description length. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44:133--152.

Google

Hare, M. and Elman, J. L. (1995). Learning and morphological change. Cognition, 56:61--98.

Google UIUC

Hopcroft, J. E. and Ullman, J. D. (1979). Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. Addison-Wesley.

Google

Hurford, J. R. (1990). Nativist and functional explanations in language acquisition. In Roca, I. M., editor, Logical issues in language acquisition, pages 85--136. Foris Publications.

Google UIUC

Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Google UIUC

Kimball, J. P. (1973). The Formal Theory of Grammar. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Google

Kirby, S. (2001). Spontaneous evolution of linguistic structure: an iterated learning model of the emergence of regularity and irregularity. IEEE Journal of Evolutionary Computation, 5(2):102--110.

Google UIUC

Kirby, S. (2002). Learning, bottlenecks and the evolution of recursive syntax. In Briscoe, E., editor, Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models, pages 173--203. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Google UIUC

Krifka, M. (2001). Compositionality. In Wilson, R. A. and Keil, F., editors, The MIT Encyclopaedia of the Cognitive Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Google

Li, M. and Vit’ anyi, P. M. B. (1997). A Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York.

Google

Lidz, J. and Waxman, S. (2004). Reaffirming the poverty of the stimulus argument: a reply to the replies. Cognition, 93:157--165.

Google

Lidz, J., Waxman, S., and Freedman, J. (2003). What infants know about syntax but couldn't have learned: Evidence for syntactic structure at 18-months. Cognition, 89:65--73.

Google

Niyogi, P. and Berwick, R. (1997). Evolutionary consequences of language learning. Linguistics and Philosophy, 20:697--719. Compositionality and Linguistic Evolution 25

Google UIUC

O'Grady, W., Dobrovolsky, M., and Katamba, F. (1997). Contemporary Linguistics. Longman, 3rd edition edition.

Google

Pinker, S. and Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13:707--784.

Google UIUC

Pitt, M. A., Myung, I. J., and Zhang, S. (2002). Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. Psychological Review, 109(3):472--491.

Google

Pullum, G. K. (1996). Learnability, hyperlearning, and the poverty of the stimulus. In Johnson, J., Juge, M. L., and Moxley, J. L., editors, Proceeding of the 22nd Annual Meeting: General session and parasession on the role of learnability in grammatical theory, pages 498--513. Berkeley Linguistic Society, Berkeley, CA.

Google

Pullum, G. K. and Scholz, B. C. (2002). Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review, 19(1-2):9--50.

Google

Rissanen, J. (1978). Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica, 14:465--471.

Google

Rissanen, J. (1989). Stochastic complexity and statistical inquiry. World Scientific.

Google

Rissanen, J. (1997). Stochastic complexity in learning. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55:89--95.

Google

Sampson, G. (1989). Language acqusition: Growth or learning? Philosophical Papers, 18:203--240.

Google

Smith, K., Brighton, H., and Kirby, S. (2003a). Complex systems in language evolution: The cultural emergence of compositonal structure. Advances in Complex Systems, 6(4):527--558.

Google UIUC

Smith, K., Kirby, S., and Brighton, H. (2003b). Iterated learning: a framework for the emergence of language. Artificial Life, 9(4):371--386.

Google UIUC

Teal, T. K. and Taylor, C. E. (2000). Effects of compression on language evolution. Artificial Life, 6(2):129--143.

Google UIUC

Wagner, L. (2001). Defending nativism in language acqusition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(7):283--284.

Google

Wexler, K. (1991). On the argument from the poverty of the stimulus. In Kasher, A., editor, The Chomskyan Turn, pages 253--270. Blackwell, Cambridge.

Google

Wolff, J. G. (1982). Language acquisition, data compression, and generalization. Language and Communication, 2(1):57--89. 26 Henry Brighton

Google

Zadrozny, W. (1994). From compositional to systematic semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 17:329--342.

Google

 HOME   ::   Back to the Paper   ::   References Comments to: junwang4 you-know-at gmail.com Last update: 11/16/07