Andersen, H. (1973). Abductive and deductive change. Language, 40:765--793. | ||
Baker, C. L. (1978). Introduction to Generative-Transformational Syntax. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. | ||
Batali, J. (2002). The negotiation and acquisition of recursive grammars as a result of competition among exemplars. In Briscoe, E., editor, Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models, pages 111--172. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. | UIUC | |
Bates, E. and Elman, J. (1996). Learning rediscovered. Science, 274:1849-1850. | ||
Brighton, H. (2002). Compositional syntax from cultural transmission. Artificial Life, 8(1):25--54. | UIUC | |
Brighton, H. (2003). Simplicity as a driving force in linguistic evolution. PhD thesis, The University of Edinburgh. | UIUC | |
Brighton, H., Kirby, S., and Smith, K. (2005). Cultural selection for learnability: Three principles underlying the view that language adapts to be learnable. In Compositionality and Linguistic Evolution 23 Tallerman, M., editor, Language Origins: Perspectives on Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford. | UIUC | |
Chater, N. (1999). The search for simplicity: A fundamental cognitive principle? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A:273--302. | ||
Chater, N. and Vit’ anyi, P. M. B. (2003). Simplicity: a unifying principle in cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(1):19--22. | ||
Chater, N. and Vit’ anyi, P. M. B. (2004). A simplicity principle for language acquistion: Re-evaluating what can be learned from positive evidence. Manuscript under review. | ||
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. | ||
Chomsky, N. (2002). On Nature and Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. | ||
Christiansen, M. H. and Kirby, S. (2003). Language evolution: consensus and controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7):300--307. | UIUC | |
Clark, R. and Roberts, I. (1993). A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry, 24(2):299--345. | UIUC | |
Comrie, B. (1989). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Blackwell, Oxford, second edition. | ||
Cover, T. and Thomas, J. (1991). Elements of information theory. Wiley Interscience, New York. | ||
Cowie, F. (1999). What's within? Nativism Reconsidered. Oxford University Press, Oxford. | ||
Crain, S. (1991). Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14:597--612. | ||
Croft, W. (1990). Typology and Universals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. | ||
Culicover, P. W. (1999). Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases, Syntactic Theory, and Language Acquistion. Oxford University Press, Oxford. | ||
Deacon, T. W. (1997). The Symbolic Species. W. W. Norton and Company. | UIUC | |
Elman, J. L. (2003). Generalization from sparse input. In Proceedings of the 38 th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 24 Henry Brighton | ||
Glendinning, P. (1994). Stability, Instability, and Chaos: An Introduction to the Theory of Nonlinear Differential Equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. | ||
Grunwald, P. (2000). Model selection based on minimum description length. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44:133--152. | ||
Hare, M. and Elman, J. L. (1995). Learning and morphological change. Cognition, 56:61--98. | UIUC | |
Hopcroft, J. E. and Ullman, J. D. (1979). Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. Addison-Wesley. | ||
Hurford, J. R. (1990). Nativist and functional explanations in language acquisition. In Roca, I. M., editor, Logical issues in language acquisition, pages 85--136. Foris Publications. | UIUC | |
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford. | UIUC | |
Kimball, J. P. (1973). The Formal Theory of Grammar. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. | ||
Kirby, S. (2001). Spontaneous evolution of linguistic structure: an iterated learning model of the emergence of regularity and irregularity. IEEE Journal of Evolutionary Computation, 5(2):102--110. | UIUC | |
Kirby, S. (2002). Learning, bottlenecks and the evolution of recursive syntax. In Briscoe, E., editor, Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models, pages 173--203. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. | UIUC | |
Krifka, M. (2001). Compositionality. In Wilson, R. A. and Keil, F., editors, The MIT Encyclopaedia of the Cognitive Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. | ||
Li, M. and Vit’ anyi, P. M. B. (1997). A Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York. | ||
Lidz, J. and Waxman, S. (2004). Reaffirming the poverty of the stimulus argument: a reply to the replies. Cognition, 93:157--165. | ||
Lidz, J., Waxman, S., and Freedman, J. (2003). What infants know about syntax but couldn't have learned: Evidence for syntactic structure at 18-months. Cognition, 89:65--73. | ||
Niyogi, P. and Berwick, R. (1997). Evolutionary consequences of language learning. Linguistics and Philosophy, 20:697--719. Compositionality and Linguistic Evolution 25 | UIUC | |
O'Grady, W., Dobrovolsky, M., and Katamba, F. (1997). Contemporary Linguistics. Longman, 3rd edition edition. | ||
Pinker, S. and Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13:707--784. | UIUC | |
Pitt, M. A., Myung, I. J., and Zhang, S. (2002). Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. Psychological Review, 109(3):472--491. | ||
Pullum, G. K. (1996). Learnability, hyperlearning, and the poverty of the stimulus. In Johnson, J., Juge, M. L., and Moxley, J. L., editors, Proceeding of the 22nd Annual Meeting: General session and parasession on the role of learnability in grammatical theory, pages 498--513. Berkeley Linguistic Society, Berkeley, CA. | ||
Pullum, G. K. and Scholz, B. C. (2002). Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review, 19(1-2):9--50. | ||
Rissanen, J. (1978). Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica, 14:465--471. | ||
Rissanen, J. (1989). Stochastic complexity and statistical inquiry. World Scientific. | ||
Rissanen, J. (1997). Stochastic complexity in learning. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55:89--95. | ||
Sampson, G. (1989). Language acqusition: Growth or learning? Philosophical Papers, 18:203--240. | ||
Smith, K., Brighton, H., and Kirby, S. (2003a). Complex systems in language evolution: The cultural emergence of compositonal structure. Advances in Complex Systems, 6(4):527--558. | UIUC | |
Smith, K., Kirby, S., and Brighton, H. (2003b). Iterated learning: a framework for the emergence of language. Artificial Life, 9(4):371--386. | UIUC | |
Teal, T. K. and Taylor, C. E. (2000). Effects of compression on language evolution. Artificial Life, 6(2):129--143. | UIUC | |
Wagner, L. (2001). Defending nativism in language acqusition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(7):283--284. | ||
Wexler, K. (1991). On the argument from the poverty of the stimulus. In Kasher, A., editor, The Chomskyan Turn, pages 253--270. Blackwell, Cambridge. | ||
Wolff, J. G. (1982). Language acquisition, data compression, and generalization. Language and Communication, 2(1):57--89. 26 Henry Brighton | ||
Zadrozny, W. (1994). From compositional to systematic semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 17:329--342. |
| HOME :: Back to the Paper :: References | Comments to: junwang4 you-know-at gmail.com | Last update: 11/16/07 |