HOME   ::  Conference List   ::   Conference Paper

Noble, J. (1998) Evolved Signals: Expensive Hype vs. Conspirational Whispers. In C. Adami and R. Belew and H. Kitano and C. Taylor, editors, Artificial Life VI, pages 358--67. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press..
Bookmark:  

Full-text
   URL: http://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/jasonn/Resea.../CoopComp/alife98.ps
   Cached: PDF-202K    PS-380K    PS.gz-91K   
   SAVE AS an easy-to-recall long filename:
      Filename format: author--year--title   PDF-202K    PS-91K    :: About GZip'd PS
      Filename format: author--year--title--journal|proceedings|...--pages   PDF-202K    PS-91K   

Related links
  Web search: Google Web Search   ::   Google Scholar
  Within this site: Cited by (10)    References (16)

Paper at a Glance

Evolved Signals: Expensive Hype vs. Conspiratorial Whispers
Jason Noble
School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences
University of Sussex
Brighton BN1 9QH, U.K.
jasonn@cogs.susx.ac.uk
Abstract Artificial life models of the evolution of communica­ tion have usually assumed either cooperative or com­ petitive contexts. This paper presents a general model that covers signalling with and without conflicts of interest between signallers and receivers. Krebs & Dawkins (1984) argued that a conflict of interests will lead to an evolutionary arms race between ma­ nipulative signallers and sceptical receivers, resulting in ever more costly signals; whereas common inter­ ests will lead to cheap signals or ``conspiratorial whis­ pers''. Simple game­theoretic and evolutionary simu­ lation models suggest that signalling will evolve only if it is in the interests of both parties. In a model where signallers may inform receivers as to the value of a binary random variable, if signalling is favoured at all, then signallers will always use the cheapest and the second­cheapest signal available. Costly sig­ nalling arms races do not get started. A more com­ plex evolutionary simulation was constructed, featur­ ing continuously variable signal strengths and recep­ tion thresholds. As the congruence of interests be­ tween the parties became more clear­cut, the evolu­ tion of successively cheaper signals was observed. The findings are taken to support a modified version of Krebs & Dawkins's argument. Artificial life models of communication Artificial life (AL) models of the evolution of communi­ cation are often constructed such that honest signalling is in the interests of both signallers and receivers---any communication systems that evolve can therefore be described as cooperative. For example, Werner & Dyer (1992) postulated blind, mobile males and sighted, im­ mobile females: the evolution of a signalling system was in the interests of both parties as it allowed mat­ ing to take place ...
BibTex
@inproceedings{noble98evolvedSignals,
  author={J. Noble},
  title={Evolved Signals: Expensive Hype vs. Conspirational Whispers},
  year={1998},
  pages={358-67},
  address={Cambridge, MA},
  editor={C. Adami and R. Belew and H. Kitano and C. Taylor},
  publisher={MIT Press.},
  booktitle={Artificial Life VI},
  url={http://www.isrl.uiuc.edu/~amag/langev/paper/noble98evolvedSignals.html}
}


 HOME   ::  Conference List   ::   Conference Paper Comments to: junwang4 you-know-at gmail.com Last update: 2/2/08