Jim Hurford - 1999 - Functional Innateness: explaining the critical period for language acquisition

Hurford, J. (1999) Functional Innateness: explaining the critical period for language acquisition. In Michael Darnell and Edith Moravscik and Frederick Newmeyer and Michael Noonan and Kathleen Wheatley, editors, Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, Volume II: Case Studies, pages 341--363. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Bookmark:

Full-text
   URL: http://www.ling.ed.ac.uk/~jim/milwaukee.paper.s.ps

   Cached: PDF-182K    PS-161K    PS.gz-51K

   SAVE AS an easy-to-recall long filename:

      Filename format: author--year--title   PDF-182K    PS-51K    :: About GZip'd PS

      Filename format: author--year--title--journal|proceedings|...--pages   PDF-182K    PS-51K

Related links

   CiteSeer: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/james98functional.html

  Web search: Google Web Search :: Google Scholar

  Within this site: Cited by (4)    References (35)

Paper at a Glance

FUNCTIONAL INNATENESS:
EXPLAINING THE CRITICAL PERIOD
FOR LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
James R. Hurford
Department of Linguistics
University of Edinburgh
Professor James R Hurford,
Department of Linguistics,
University of Edinburgh,
Adam Ferguson Building,
40 George Square,
Edinburgh EH8 9LL,
Scotland,
UK.
(Boldface used for emphasis.)
1
Abstract In recent years, several explanations have been offered for the critical period in language acqui sition, itself, a priori a somehwta surprising phenomenon. Two such explanations are considered here. Both studies use computer simulations, but the factors they model are very different. Hurford (1991) simulates the phylogenetic evolution over hundreds of generations of a species in which the timing of life history traits is under genetic control. The period when an individual is most proficient at language acquisition is just such a life history trait, and is capable of adaptive evolution. Evolutionary simulations lead to a concentration of language acquisition proficiency in the period up to puberty, with a subsequent tailing off. Elman (1993) demonstrates `the advantages of starting small' in neural networks learning mini languages with many of the complex interacting grammatical factors found in real languages. A neural network which starts mature, with a full adult `working memory' cannot acquire such complex grammatical competence, whereas a net whose attention span is initially limited and then grows with maturation can acquire the appropriate grammar. This explains, in adaptive terms, the existence of a period in which an organism's characteristics, relevant to the language learning task, change, increasing a certain capacity (`working memory') from an immature to an adult value. These accounts are complementary and mutually compatible. An evolutionary account is pro posed, in which genetically controlled `working memory' size in relation to life history is the variable operated on by natural selection. This account ...

BibTex

@incollection{hurford99functionalInnateness,
  author={J. Hurford},
  title={Functional Innateness: explaining the critical period for language acquisition},
  year={1999},
  pages={341-363},
  address={John Benjamins, Amsterdam},
  editor={Michael Darnell and Edith Moravscik and Frederick Newmeyer and Michael Noonan and Kathleen Wheatley},
  publisher={},
  booktitle={Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, Volume II: Case Studies},
  url={http://www.isrl.uiuc.edu/~amag/langev/paper/hurford99functionalInnateness.html}
}

HOME :: Edited Book List :: Book Chapter Comments to: junwang4 you-know-at gmail.com Last update: 2/2/08


HOME :: Edited Book List :: Book Chapter	Comments to: junwang4 you-know-at gmail.com	Last update: 2/2/08