| Bookmark: |
Full-text
| URL: http://www.jaist.ac.jp/~hash/papers/symgram-ICDC.ps.gz |
| Cached: PDF-145K PS-679K PS.gz-62K |
| SAVE AS an easy-to-recall long filename: |
| Filename format: author--year--title PDF-145K PS-62K :: About GZip'd PS |
| Filename format: author--year--title--journal|proceedings|...--pages PDF-145K PS-62K |
Related links
| Web search: Google Web Search :: Google Scholar |
| Within this site: Cited by (1) References (5) |
Paper at a Glance
BibTexCommunication Network of Symbolic Grammar Systems TAKASHI HASHIMOTO 3 and TAKASHI IKEGAMI y 3 The Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University y Institute of Physics, College of Arts and Sciences, University of TokyoAbstract Interacting agents with symbolic grammar are proposed in order to study the evolution of computational ability of agents. The algorithmic evolution of the formal grammar system is characterized by Chomsky's hierarchy 1 . Agents with a higher grammar can speak/recognize many more words than those with a lower one. However, when agents form a network, the higher Chomsky grammar is not always advantageous. It is shown that to speak/recognize commonly used words is more favorable in a network.
INTRODUCTION In this paper we present an evolutionary model of interacting agents with symbolic grammar. Our main concern is to see how a higher level of grammar evolves from the lower ones. Regarding computational ability as a measure of evolution, we naturally ask, what evolutionary dynamics can elaborate computational ability? Introducing an ensemble of agents, we discuss its evolution. We see evolutionary pathways of climbing up Chomsky's hierarchy and show how they are avoided by the ensemble. DYNAMICAL MODELING OF COMMUNICATION NETWORK We characterize each agents by a set of rewriting rules, V !a, where V is a nonterminal symbol and a is a list of nonterminal and terminal symbols. To generate sentences, the agents apply their rules from the left to right hand side. If there are several rewriting paths, one of them is selected randomly. To recognize sentences, rules are applied in the opposite direction. If a agent rewrites a sentence to the start symbol ''S'' in finite rewriting steps, the agent can recognize it. When we make a network of agents, each agent speaks in turn by using its grammar and tries to recognize the sentences spoken by the others. 3 email: toshiwo@sacral.c.utokyo.ac.jp y email: ikeg@sacral.c.utokyo.ac.jp 1 ...
@inproceedings{hashimoto95communicationNetwork,
author={T. Hashimoto and T. Ikegami},
title={Communication Network of Symbolic Grammar Systems},
year={1995},
pages={595--598},
address={Singapore},
editor={Y. Aizawa and et al.},
publisher={World Scientific},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Dynamical Systems and Chaos},
url={http://www.isrl.uiuc.edu/~amag/langev/paper/hashimoto95communicationNetwork.html}
}
| HOME :: Conference List :: Conference Paper | Comments to: junwang4 you-know-at gmail.com | Last update: 2/2/08 |