| Bookmark: |
Full-text
| URL: http://hfac.gmu.edu/~cogsci/final_ind_files/foundalis1.pdf |
| Cached: PDF-95K |
| SAVE AS an easy-to-recall long filename: |
| Filename format: author--year--title PDF-95K |
| Filename format: author--year--title--journal|proceedings|...--pages PDF-95K |
Related links
| Source: http://hfac.gmu.edu/~cogsci/program/talklist.html |
| Web search: Google Web Search :: Google Scholar |
| Within this site: References (10) |
Paper at a Glance
BibTexEvolution of Gender in IndoEuropean Languages Harry E. Foundalis (hfoundal@cs.indiana.edu) Computer Science and Cognitive Science Indiana University, Center for Research on Concepts and Cognition Bloomington, IN 47405 USAAbstract In a recent paper, Lera Boroditsky and Lauren A. Schmidt (2000) examined the degree to which the linguistic category of grammatical gender of nouns influences people's perception of the cognitive category of biological gender, or sex. Their conclusion was that English speakers' intuitions about the gender of certain nouns (animals) correlate with the gender assigned to those nouns in languages such as German and Spanish. More important, they found that people's ideas about the putative biological gender (sex) of objects are strongly influenced by the grammatical gender of those objects in their native language. In this study I sought to reproduce Boroditsky and Schmidt's results in order to show that the interpretation they supplied is unwarranted, and that the authors conflate the concepts of biological gender (sex) and ``formal gender'', which is employed by most IndoEuropean languages (as opposed to ``natural gender'', in English). I compare the intuitions of 20 American monolinguals with the statistics of formal gender as it appears in 14 IndoEuropean languages. Moreover, I discuss the possible origin and evolution of gender in such languages, and suggest an explanation for the relation between grammatical and biological gender.
Introduction The idea that our native language may shape our thought, in part or in whole, is usually associated with the work of Whorf and Sapir, in what is known as ``the SapirWhorf hypothesis'' (Whorf, 1956). This is an intriguing hypothesis because it implies that different cultures --- speaking different languages --- may perceive the world in different ways. For example, whereas one culture may differentiate objects on the basis of shape, another culture may differentiate them on the basis of ...
@inproceedings{foundalis02evolutionOf,
author={Harry E. Foundalis},
title={Evolution of Gender in Indo-European Languages},
year={2002},
address={Fairfax, Virginia},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society},
url={http://www.isrl.uiuc.edu/~amag/langev/paper/foundalis02evolutionOf.html}
}
| HOME :: Conference List :: Conference Paper | Comments to: junwang4 you-know-at gmail.com | Last update: 9/15/08 |