|
Semester: Fall 2002
Instructor: Bertram Bruce Time: Tu/Th, 2:00-3:20 pm Place: 126/131 LIS TA: Weihong Peng, Tu 3:30-5:30 pm Credit: 3 hours; 1 unit Prerequisites: LIS 201 or 202; this is the capstone course for the ITS minor; open to graduate students and others with permission |
Goals
Readings Communication, Blog, LEEP Assignments & grading, C-Base Projects, Human subjects Inquiry Page, Bibliography FAQ Printable version Today |
This is the capstone course for the Information Technology Studies minor. The seminar explores what it means to be information literate in today's world. Students examine a number of information literacies, from print to multimedia, from stand-alone to networked, and discuss a variety of themes that have been affected by new communication and information technologies, such as community, the political sphere, and education.
We don't notice the technologies of literacy because we treat our literacy technologies as natural and inevitable: How else could one write except with a pen and paper, or a typewriter? But when we look at literacy cross-culturally, or historically, it becomes difficult to ignore the means and the media by which people communicate. That we often conceive literacy without mentioning its technologies tells us mostly that these technologies are deeply embedded in our daily practices. --Bruce, 1998, "New Literacies"
What then are we doing when we teach children to read and write? We have taken this for granted for so long that it seems strange to question it. --Martin Hoyles, The politics of literacy, p. 22.
As we enter the twenty-first century, we see literacy practices evolving as well as becoming more central in our lives. The nature of texts is changing, as they are re-presented through online communities, web sites, video, hypermedia, virtual reality, and other new technologies. These changes call on us to re-visit enduring questions about readers, writers, and texts, whether these texts be oral, traditional books, or new media. We also need to consider the impact on young people: how they make meaning as they both respond to and create texts; how cultural meanings are re-created within each new generation.
The advent of video, the web, online communities, virtual reality, and other new technologies has given rise to the concept of new literacies such as computer literacy, visual literacy, and information literacy. This course explores these literacies and their relation to traditional concepts, with a focus on literacy as situated practice. Major themes include emerging media, historical perspectives, personal meaning, ethical and policy issues, learning opportunities, and community.
In the course, students ...
Readings
The course is organized around major themes or units, each comprising two or more weeks. Each of these is important for society generally and raises questions about the future of literacy. The questions generate real controversy, and radically different opposing perspectives. Each also poses some deep challenges to conventional understandings and practices. As the semester goes along, you will see more and more interconnections among these issues. In general, the first week of each topic will introduce the basic issues at stake; the second (and sometimes third) weeks will push these issues further, uncovering additional layers that may not be immediately apparent.
Each course unit features readings, audio lectures, and exploratory activities related to a theme. Assigned readings should be seen as just the starting point for your studies. Additional materials is in the course bibliography, and loads of additional material can be accessed through web searches.
One required book is When information came of age, by Daniel R. Headrick. The other required readings can be purchased as a course packet from the TIS Bookstore on Sixth St.
Students will use, learn through, and critique a variety of new literacy technologies :
Assignments & grading
There are no exams. Grades are based on:
- A semester-long project, reported in six stages (40%), marked by
in the schedule. Some tips:
- Be sure to look at examples of past projects for ideas about content, format, and length. Note that in some cases the project Inquiry Unit was a draft, rather than the final version. A typical one-person final report might be ~3000 words, more if it's essentially a review article, less if it's reporting on a service learning project. A report by three or four people might be twice as long, but you should use whatever space you need to develop your story. The JAAL columns are another reasonable model in terms of scope.
- A group project is assumed to receive equivalent, but not necessarily the same, contributions from group members, and is expected to be more substantial than an individual project.
- Research involving human subjects, such as interviewing, surveys, or observations, requires Institutional Review Board approval. If it fits within the existing approval from the Institutional Review Board (see IRB-1), no additional approval process is needed. Research participants should be informed fully of the research and given a copy of the consent letter.
- If the research involves schools, an additional approval is required through the Bureau of Educational Research.
- Six smaller assignments (40%), each marked by
in the schedule. The last assignment is a reflection paper: What have you learned from the course activities? What do you see as the future for literacy? ...the most surprising changes? Do you see ways to apply that learning to your own work?;
- Participation in discussions, discoveries, class notes, helping others learn, computer helper, ... (20%). Notify in advance about any absence and complete alternate assignment.
Work must turned submitted through C-Base by the date on which the assignment is listed in the schedule in order to receive full consideration. The grading is criterion-based, with an indication in C-Base:
Excellent,exceeds expectations, "A" quality work
Does what was required, "B" quality work
Something missing, with an indication of the work that is needed. If you choose to do so, you may revise the assignment in order to improve your grade.